This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This is a simple and often overlooked strategy that gives the best of both worlds: strict separation of IAM policies and cost attribution with simple inter-connection at the network level. For small scale setups or for early adopters of IPv6 (which is worth a separate blog post) this could be an acceptable risk.
On top of that, since our BGP nodes were identical, the distribution of sessions should be balanced. Given that we only have one IP active in on each node, the next step was to have this landing node act as a router for inbound BGP connections with policy routing as the high-level design.
IPV6 is not supported and should be disabled. Externally facing services such as Hue and Hive on Tez (HS2) roles can be more limited to specific ports and loadbalanced as appropriate for high availability. If a customer requires SELinux enforcement, they need to test and implement the policies themselves.
Compliance teams can check on policy violations, licensing status of products and more. For instance, wouldn’t it be nice to know which assets had been labeled “unsafe” with regard to Content Security Policy (CSP) headers? For instance, let’s say you are looking for BigIP loadbalancers from F5 in your inventory.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 49,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content