This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Martin Fowler argues that internal quality of a software system enables new features and improvements to be delivered more sustainably. In Accelerate , Nicole Forsgren shows a link between well-designed, loosely-coupled architecture and more frequent software delivery. They prefer to work in isolation and just deliver.
Being on the leading-edge of softwaredevelopment requires quality observability insights, and the company wanted a new partner that could support their engineering charter for continual improvement and growth. As Josh explains, “Quality data and context are imperative to sustain our advancements. The challenge?
Before joining CircleCI, my years of experience led me to believe that I was an engineer with a firm understanding of the technical aspects of the craft, as well as what is considered good practice. At CircleCI, my team uses a short-lived branching model for softwaredevelopment. We build this together.
The approach they’ve had the entire way through felt deeply centered on people-first, characterizing people as non-linear first-order components in softwaredevelopment , and fully aware of sociotechnical challenges The awareness of people’s value appeared to run deep throughout the company.
The pressure on today’s development teams is real: innovate, release quickly, and then do it all again, only faster. Is it any surprise that studies are showing 83% of softwaredevelopers are feeling burnout? But even the best observability offering needs a culture of support.
He describes “some surprising theories about softwareengineering”: I discuss these theories in terms of two fundamentally different development styles, the "cathedral" model of most of the commercial world versus the "bazaar" model of the Linux world. A production view of softwaredevelopment is fundamentally flawed.
The cost of these small domain-related changes (like renaming, and extracting parts of code) is so little that it should be a good habit of every professional developer. In this story, the engineers and project manager decided to be bold and spend the time improving the model at the risk of missing a deadline.
My first question is in terms of this chaos engineeringculture, how does this play between your team with all the teams? My SRE team looks more like a softwaredevelopment team than it looks like assisted team. Some of them have that background but in reality most of them are softwaredevelopers.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 49,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content