This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In many organizations, automated testing lags behind and becomes a bottleneck for successful continuous delivery. Either tests do not provide enough confidence or companies take a very traditional approach, resulting in releases either introducing substantial risks or becoming costly.
It’s been a fascinating opportunity to rebuild an engineeringorganization from the inside, and I’m loving every minute. We’re introducing a lot of cutting-edge software development practices, such as self-organizing vertically-scaled teams and Extreme Programming. Culture doesn’t change easily. Too many, possibly.
In the user acceptance phase of software testing, developers provide part or all of the application to end-users or their representatives to model real-world interactions and functionality. Many healthy engineeringcultures avoid relying heavily on user acceptance testing due to its unreliability, cost, and time consumption.
Below, we’ll discuss 6 of the essential issues and factors that organizations need to consider when refreshing their legacy.NET apps. Legacy applications create pain points because they hold the organization back from innovation in other technologies as well. Establishing an IT culture. Identifying your business priorities.
Gone are the days when we managed individual servers dedicated to our organization, comfortable with the knowledge of the unique quirks of our setup. Pulumi is an infrastructure as code platform you can use to help create a cloud engineeringculture in your organization.
PDF) Culture Changes The purpose of the new career ladder is to help change the engineeringculture at OpenSesame. In contrast to the Engineer Track, which focuses on peer leadership, managers focus on the team as a system, with an emphasis on people, process, and product. Here’s the latest version of the ladder.
Kent Beck concluded , Measure developer productivity? My favorite discussion of the topic is Robert Austins, who wrote Measuring and Managing Performance in Organizations. Given that I couldnt give my CEO what he wanted without creating dysfunction in engineering, what could I give him? Were an inverted organization.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 49,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content