This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
There’s huge variety between those two extremes, and there’s also a point where too much focus on design and not enough on delivery is hugely counter-productive as well. Both valuing design and striving for continuousdelivery are necessary. They prefer to work in isolation and just deliver. It can be a cost-effective approach.
EngineeringCulture that focuses on building Quality and Simplicity – build a ContinuousDelivery pipeline that allows teams to deliver value independently of one another. Cross-Functional Product Oriented Teams (aka Feature Teams) – rather than building teams according to their functional layer (e.g.
In many organizations, automated testing lags behind and becomes a bottleneck for successful continuousdelivery. Either tests do not provide enough confidence or companies take a very traditional approach, resulting in releases either introducing substantial risks or becoming costly.
For instance, it is in the CISO’s best interests to help set up the compliance and security tests to ensure the software being rolled out is as secure as possible, especially if you want continuousdelivery. Conclusion. The Paved Road is a great solution for standardising and managing compliance, but it is not suitable for everyone.
Functional monitoring is a crucial part of any successful ContinuousDelivery implementation. We often see development teams having difficulty striking the right balance between different kinds of monitoring, focusing on observability primarily in terms of technical metrics like error rate.
Build a pl atform b ased on an actual need. For example, to improve developer experience, reduce cognitive load, or bring desired capabilities to the teams that were not available before.
Delivery?—?A A fully-managed continuous-delivery system of pipelines, continuous integration jobs, and end to end tests. Each subsystem addresses a different concern of a service and can be deployed independently through a purpose-built managed ContinuousDelivery process. Productivity?—?Local
I picked some of my favorite books at my company, Semaphore — books that have profoundly influenced the company’s engineeringculture. This list contains a mixture of classic, timeless texts and a fair share of modern game-changing publications, aimed at senior engineers and devs.
Choosing where to focus is a balancing act: delivering new products, fixing legacy software, and improving engineeringculture. Another hurdle to decision making is when technology leaders feel that the skills needed to deliver big changes don’t exist within the organization like the lack of DDD, architecture, or cloud skills.
Managing that interaction with the cloud is part of what cloud engineering is all about. To deliver applications cleanly, you need to manage infrastructure with pipelines just like you manage continuousdelivery. You can bring the practices of application delivery to infrastructure as code with the maturity of cloud engineering.
Software testing, especially in large scale projects, is a time intensive process. Test suites may be computationally expensive, compete with each other for available hardware, or simply be so large as to cause considerable delay until their results are available.
To me, this story is what DDD is really about: developing the design mindset of a modeller to drive product innovation and enable continuousdelivery of value, involving frequent collaboration with domain experts. It’s the Share Pie story in chapter 8 of Eric Evans’ DDD book.
If you like the ideas in the post, then why not come and join me at Navico and help us to build a highly-innovative engineeringculture and a brilliant place to work. The best thing is, this type of culture comes almost for free when you treat developers extremely well (as discussed previously).
At the November Test in Production Meetup in San Francisco, LaunchDarkly’s Yoz Grahame (a Developer Advocate) moderated a panel discussion featuring Larry Lancaster, Founder and CTO at Zebrium, and Ramin Khatibi, a Site Reliability Engineer (SRE) and infrastructure consultant.
Dramatic advances in software engineering workflow can be traced to the 2010 book ContinuousDelivery [22] by Jez Humble and David Farley. And yet, most enterprises thought rapid delivery was an anomaly – certainly serious enterprises that valued stability would not engage in such dangerous practices.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 49,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content