This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Autonomy & Alignment: Spotify EngineeringCulture – part 1, Henrik Kniberg, 2019. When you focus on value delivery alone, you risk sustainability for the future. However, if you spend too much on development, the value delivered will be too low to sustain a viable business.
He describes “some surprising theories about software engineering”: I discuss these theories in terms of two fundamentally different development styles, the "cathedral" model of most of the commercial world versus the "bazaar" model of the Linux world. They create an engaging engineeringculture. Culture is.”
My first question is in terms of this chaos engineeringculture, how does this play between your team with all the teams? Corey: It’s 2019. In reality, I just think that approach is not sustainable. Again, it’s 2019. I think in the headquarter, the New York Times. Audience: Sure, sure, sure.
In March I wrote the following: Observability is a paradigm on which we can build a safe, healthy, sustainable future for the tech industry. link] — Charity Majors (@mipsytipsy) November 2, 2019. We’re trying to build something sustainable here, and the people who make up Honeycomb are more than just “resources.”
In March I wrote the following: Observability is a paradigm on which we can build a safe, healthy, sustainable future for the tech industry. link] — Charity Majors (@mipsytipsy) November 2, 2019. We’re trying to build something sustainable here, and the people who make up Honeycomb are more than just “resources.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 49,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content