This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Every large agile framework that I know of is an excuse to avoid the difficult and challenging work of sorting out the organization’s systemarchitecture so that small agile teams can work independently. For example, the dependencies generated by the big back end of a banking system is a huge source of friction for product teams.
An excellent way to approach it is with C4 PlantUML—a powerful tool that allows developers to generate comprehensive systemarchitecture documentation with just a few lines of code, making the documentation process not only efficient but also an integral part of the development workflow.
“We believe that the major contributor to this complexity in many systems is the handling of state and the burden that this adds when trying to analyse and reason about the system” [emphasis added]. Out of the Tar Pit, 2006. The most challenging goal of any application architecture is simplicity, but it is possible to achieve.
Rooney 2006] experienced that problem, with regrettable results: We weren’t sure what our priorities were. For example, if your team is contributing to a larger product, decisions about systemarchitecture may be out of your hands. If they don’t, your team is likely to start drifting off-course.
The first is a joint systemsarchitecture. Developing interoperable systems allows different welfare programs and services to connect seamlessly, providing a holistic view of beneficiaries. However, from a technological standpoint, most welfare providers are only at the early stages of embracing a joint systemsarchitecture.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 49,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content